famous case laws in pakistan Secrets
famous case laws in pakistan Secrets
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
Law professors traditionally have played a much smaller sized role in establishing case legislation in common legislation than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much with the exposition with the regulation in civil regulation traditions is finished by teachers alternatively than by judges; this is called doctrine and could be published in treatises or in journals which include Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied minimal on legal scholarship; thus, at the turn of the twentieth century, it absolutely was quite exceptional to discover an educational writer quoted in a very legal decision (other than Probably to the educational writings of well known judges like Coke and Blackstone).
The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that while thinking of the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the merit of the many qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of the respondent department.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an check here offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided from the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.